Proven mortgage fozia shan siddiqi remax in Florida. Here is the story of actual car and a mortgage fraud in Florida foreclosure case. You figure out how to make money selling your car title multiple times like the banks do. The foreclosing bank in a mortgage fraud in Florida court figured out the same way from the same note and mortgage years ago by mortgage securitization. Are either or both fraud?
In front of the judge in your car fraud case, the judge asks you, “Did you sell your car to 10 different people?” You tell him you did not sell your car, you sold the beneficial interest with a copy of your car title the way the banks do for a mortgage. The judge finds that you have committed Florida Fraud by not selling your car to only one person, but you used an illegal multi car title scam to make money illegally from the victims.
In front of the judge in your mortgage fraud in Florida foreclosure case, the judge asks you if you’re behind on your mortgage payments. You inform the judge that your mortgage and note have been paid in full. The judge then asks if you paid off the mortgage. No, you did not personally pay the mortgage, but the mortgage was paid by a third party when the Lender sold your mortgage loan by your mortgage contract.
The attorney tells the judge that you defaulted on paying your note and mortgage. The attorney sidesteps the issue that the original lender was paid in full as stipulated in the original mortgage contract with you under local and federal law, and that the note and mortgage contract were paid and there is no more note or mortgage. In law it does not matter who paid the note and mortgage, just whether or not the Lender has been paid under mortgage contract law.
You remind the judge of the car fraud case where the judge decided that it was car fraud. Now the lender has sold your beneficial interest to a bank or trust and was paid in full; thus, completing your mortgage contract with that Lender. Your original, paper note and mortgage is under Federal UCC, Article 3. The trustee unlawfully converted the tangible note and mortgage into a stock or bond certificate under Federal UCC, Article 8 without your knowledge or consent.
There was no contract with the new purchasing entity from you. There was a bogus contract with a different debtor, the Lender, and not with you. Under UCC, Article 8, the bank converted your note and mortgage again into an intangible electronic format copies and converted them under UCC Article 9, an Intangible counterfeit, under 18 USC § 2320, and commenced to assign the beneficial interest only of the same note and mortgage to thousands of certificate holders and investors who each owned only a fraction of the beneficial interest. The lender, trust, trustee, purchasing bank, and investors also committed mortgage fraud in Florida the same way you supposedly committed car fraud by selling the same note and mortgage multiple times to multiple persons or groups of investors to make more money.
The foreclosing attorney told the judge that you failed to make your monthly payments as per the note and mortgage contract that you signed; thus, guiding the judge’s decision in this mortgage fraud in Florida foreclosure case in favor of the foreclosing bank.
The Note and mortgage have been paid! In the letter of the law, it does not matter who paid the note, just whether or not it has been paid, but the judge does not take the law into consideration and rules that the bank has the right and consent to foreclose on your property.
Here, you are doing the same thing the banks are doing and you get convicted of fraud and the banks get to foreclose on your home or commercial property.
